Comment

Comment by Rob Moore on October 9, 2011 at 6:54pm

So all the sniveling do-gooders had their little win....who cares when you have 80% support!

         Just read that interesting article on your Link , Julene.

 

I feel that I have a lot in common with Andrew- same age and mindset- say what we beleive in and stuff the consequences. More power to him.

 

Also your  Fairdinkum radio-link Leon is thorough as well. 

 

Comment by Beverley Prescott on October 6, 2011 at 4:27pm

http://www.ipa.org.au/publications/1928/82-per-cent-of-australians-...

82% of Australians do not agree with the verdict that found Andres Bolt guilty.


This should never have been a court case - he could have been corrected like anyone else would have been had it not been someone who tells it like it is.

Comment by Denise Scanlan on October 3, 2011 at 2:41pm

Andrew had a say on his program yesterday and found supporters for his view and the impact of this verdict. The thing is, so many Australians do believe as he does and that's why he writes such opinions. He knows the average person has views on this and other issues but this is typical of this government to shut down any speech that may oppose them.

 

We have no lucky country anymore, but we do have one that is becoming entrenched in cotnrol by authorities.

Comment by Ian Davies on October 2, 2011 at 10:26pm

We live in hope! gives one a better understanding on a comment by T.A & a few others.

Comment by Michael Petterson on October 2, 2011 at 9:39pm

If it does come,I suspect the public outcry will be as great,if not greater than the carbon tax. People are still annoyed about the lies over that.  Maybe the outcry will finally be great enough to remove this government and give us one we can trust finally.

Comment by Ian Davies on October 2, 2011 at 9:07pm

I would suggest reading this: http://www.aar.com.au/pubs/cmt/fopriv30sep11.htm

 

Best to read the entire article & think how it may impact comment in the future.

Focus: Government consults on new right to sue for invasion of privacy

30 September 2011

In brief: Individuals could soon gain the right to sue other individuals and companies over serious invasions of privacy if the Federal Government adopts recommendations in a long-awaited issues paper.

Comment by Michael Petterson on October 2, 2011 at 6:33pm

I do hope he appeals the decision..

Comment by Leon Pittard on October 2, 2011 at 6:16pm

This is a real wedge issue. In context it follows the earlier calls by Brown and Gillard for media overhaul. It will come, its just when. No government that is dishonest can allow scutiny of its actions. You can also read the previous article at base of same page. Just think of all the policies they wont allow scrutiny or debate on.

• An annexed NBN
• Carbon Tax
• Science of AGW
• Dirty deals - Thomson
• Gillards past arrangements
• Etc

Comment by Ian Davies on October 2, 2011 at 12:57pm

A topic that needs to be cleaned up & because the comment was from A.B they attack spurred on by the Agenda brigade. Past rulings of law allow this crap & it needs to be dealt with. 

USA methods:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_quantum_laws

Comment by Laurel V on October 2, 2011 at 1:05am

was anyone really? surprised?

the small but vocal and bleeding heart funded lobby groups , are having a field day with the greens to prop em up.

and as green labor are watermelons par excellence, this is their baby!

stop the media, stop any person expressing an opinion they dont like.

if we had salt Mines theyd be planning to send many of us there.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page