In November 2006 we had the SPM meeting of WG-2.

We are very visible, which is why we have to be careful in our practices making sure it is in accord with our status of a
credible group of scientists. Regretfully, some problems evolve progressively in the last years. The key point is that the
life style of a scientist presumes certain living standards that are reasonably good, but by no means compatible in any
sense with the lifestyle and standards of the top business people or policymakers, whom we often address our work.
And here I see the need for immediate attention. I will give one example.
In November 2006 we had the SPM meeting of WG-2. The meeting was organized in one of the worlds-most expensive
places – relatively small and fancy hotel in Surrey, the UK. Everything, -pronounced luxury of the private environment,
the room prices, proximity to the Royal residence, indicated that this is not a right place to organize the meeting of
IPCC experts! I expressed my concern writing to the IPCC Secretariat and to the TSU, who have chosen this place, but
it was left without attention. Our meeting took place in this hotel, and we ended up discussing one of the WG-2 favorite
topics, “The risk of hunger”, during the lunch that costs 18 UK pounds per person! On a minor note, this everyday
lunch was part of a hotel package; the menu and price were not negotiable. It was a shame of IPCC, which does not
have any excuse in my mind. We would never pass “The Sun” test in the UK, should there be any leakage of this
information, and our credibility would have been lost forever. I talked with some of my colleagues during this meeting,
and their position surprised me. Many of them agreed with me that this is not how scientist live, and also not how the
taxpayers, who ultimately take all the bills, think the scientist who drive them into the future should live. However,
people are weak, they can not resist such offers, if someone pays for it.
My only form of protest at that time was to decline the “luxury” package, to get a room in “B&B” in the small town
nearby and to have a nice 45 minute walk every morning to this isolated place. Now when we discuss the future of
IPCC I want to revisit this issue. We have to discontinue this practice. If we go further this way, next time there will be
limousines surrounded by body guards that bring IPCC experts and senior officials to the meeting place… This is the
way to nowhere, we should not replicate the lifestyles of some ambitious business people and politicians.
I fully support the practice of IPCC meetings being held in different regions of the world, I see good rationale for it.
However, we have to scale the standards of these meetings to the level that is appropriate for the scientists. This is a
must, otherwise our credibility will occasionally be gone forever. We will never be heard if we direct people how to
fight hunger while enjoying 18 UK pound lunch.

Views: 48

Tags: IPCC, Theses, an, are, being, caught, gravy, in, innocently, obvious, More…of, respected, scientist, the, train, up, well, words

Comment

You need to be a member of Just Grounds Community to add comments!

Join Just Grounds Community

Comment by Laurel Ender on February 1, 2010 at 9:36pm
Nice to hear an ethical comment about the excesses, I sure didnt see many at Copenhagen commenting about much else than the cold, and how they had to queue up..gee just like Normal people did. how amazing:-)
your point is true, so many of the decision makers for the average person have NO idea of normal to begin with.

Honest Government, Fair Rights to property and compensation, Australia and our people strong and proud, reinstatement of values and respect

Members

Forum

Ex PM and the ALP = Past - Current - Future = 2013 / 14 606 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule 1 hour ago.

QUEENSLAND POLITICS 6 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in Politics. Last reply by Geoff Hutchesson 11 hours ago.

MIGRANTS, ASYLUM-SEEKERS, AND SOCIAL SERVICE BENEFITS (cont.) 3688 Replies

Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Activism. Last reply by Geoff Hutchesson 12 hours ago.

Islamia Anyone? 2542 Replies

Started by Bob Stewart in Activism. Last reply by Geoff Hutchesson 12 hours ago.

Economic Direction 62 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in Politics. Last reply by Alyn Roule 17 hours ago.

Internal Issue INDEX 34 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in Activism. Last reply by Alyn Roule 17 hours ago.

AGRICULTURAL MINISTER 35 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in Agriculture. Last reply by Alyn Roule 18 hours ago.

WHITE PAPERS! 14 Replies

Started by Rae Billett in Politics. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

Point of View from SA 602 Replies

Started by Bob Stewart in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

UNITED NATIONS info 118 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

RETIREMENT 65 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

COUNCIL AGENDAS 145 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

LEADERSHIP FOLLOWING THE FEDERAL ELECTION 808 Replies

Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Politics. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

CLIMATE CHANGE REALITY ?? 502 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in Climate Change. Last reply by Geoff Hutchesson yesterday.

Our Constitution 211 Replies

Started by Ian Yeates in General. Last reply by Ian Yeates yesterday.

How to bring an Industry to it's knees! 784 Replies

Started by Rob Moore in General. Last reply by Rory Donnellan yesterday.

TRADE TALK 22 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

HEALTH CARE 85 Replies

Started by Alyn Roule in Health. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.

AGRICULTURAL COMPETITVENESS - THE PPP SOLUTION 6 Replies

Started by Graham Clune in General. Last reply by Rob Moore yesterday.

© 2014   Created by Rob Moore.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service