For a very long time, farmers and rural workers have had a passive discrimination against them in the world of finance and insurance. For example, to get an insurance policy as a farmer, the danger classification was about the same as a powder monkey on a mining site! That made it ridiculously and prohibitively expensive for the average farmer, struggling to make ends meet anyway, to afford insurance or income protection.

Sure, the farm IS a dangerous place. My family don’t die of old age. We have been on the land since Adam was a kid, and through our family tree, it is evident that my family die of accidents on the farm at a very old age! One ancestor was run over by a bullock wagon at 95 years, and my grandfather was knocked over by a big cranky steer in the cattle yards when he was 88. Now that we have motorbikes and quad bikes and ultralights, I can’t see the trend changing!

Then there’s the other issue – when the farm runs at a “tax” loss from time to time, sometimes a few years in a row, how can you possibly justify an income protection insurance policy at all, let alone apply a decent monetary value to it.

Refreshingly though, times are changing. With the much greater emphasis on safety around farm equipment, the greater awareness of rural workers of safety issues and the ability in many cases to get treatment relatively quickly (faster at least than a speeding bullock wagon) in hospitals of reasonable quality – providing we don’t keep losing them from the bush, and the amazing and wonderful Royal Flying Doctor Service (RFDS), if something does go wrong, the outcomes are more likely to be treated and less severe than say 50 or even 20 years ago.

The result is that at least one of the insurance companies has come to the party with a guaranteed income protection policy for farmers and rural workers, regardless of tax returns, and at a much more reasonable price! You don’t need to submit tax returns to get a payment of $3,500 per month for an accident and illness claim, and if you do have reasonable income shown on a tax return, you can get a whole lot more.

They have also given farmers their own classification now, rather than lumping them in with manual labourers or underground miners. The new classification has greatly reduced their costs of insurance for both life and income protection types of insurance.

Other companies have gone in different directions. One offers a “Best Doctor” service, giving you independent and free medical opinions from a panel of peer reviewed doctors from wherever necessary to make sure you get the best medical attention possible if you should happen to need it. At no additional cost to you as their client.

Yet another company offers a service that can have your acceptance times cut to a matter of days or even hours from application time to you being fully insured. They are setting industry standards globally for reducing paperwork and underwriting times.

If you’d like to discuss any of these changing issues, I’m happy to help you with them. Whilst insurance is not a happy subject, it’s not one we can afford to dismiss in today’s economic climate either. With weather and markets sometimes seeming to conspire against the man on the land, we don’t need to take a chance with bad luck either!
Ray Jamieson

Tags: Insurance, accident, claim, farmer, illness, income, rfds, risk, rural worker

Views: 3

Replies to This Discussion

In my profession I needed to study statistics. It is with statistics that insurance companies ascertain what goes in a policy and what stays out, along with the amount you pay in premiums.

I know how some statisticians eliminate the data and include data that should not be there. For example: if you wish to study the stats of how many people dye on farms, and alter the stats in the companies favor. What we do is leave out all deaths that do not favor the needed evidence. Thus we leave out: natural death, road accidents, and suicide. Then increase the importance of unsafe farming practice, such as riding a bike or being in the same yard as a bull.

Thus the stats do not show a true representation of what happens on a farm. Also Time Start of stats can be altered, by gathering data only from eg; Males between the age of 18 to 45 with a specific level of education as one data set. By increasing the the age span of the data set the stats would not favor the insurance company. also including females into the data set would further decrease the stats on farming injuries, thus lowering the probability of injury thus lowering the premiums.

The argument against putting females in the data set would be: the division of labor saying that females do not do the same dangerous work as males. I know that this is not so, females often are right there next to the men doing the work.

If the stats would be representative and then compared with the mortality rates in cities, you would find that people would acutely be safer, live longer, less violence related injuries, lower road related deaths, and have less chemical related illness including food poisoning on the farm than in the city.

My Stats teacher had a sign on his door stating "Stats prove that 90% of stats are not correct"

What are your thoughts ?

Frank Smolle
Ripple Affect
Thanks Frank,
I'm just glad that after their reviews and whatever they did with the stats, the costs went down!
Cheers,
Ray

RSS

Honest Government, Fair Rights to property and compensation, Australia and our people strong and proud, reinstatement of values and respect

Members

Discussion Forum

Recognition of farmers in the business and financial world 2 Replies

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Jan 19, 2010.

Bank of America - Debtors Revolt 2 Replies

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Jan 2, 2010.

Income Protection for Farmers? Really?

Started by Ray Jamieson Oct 27, 2009.

Changing Financial Scene reflecting on Rural Opportunities 11 Replies

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Oct 24, 2009.

Birthday greetings 1 Reply

Started by Fay Helwig. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Sep 1, 2009.

The challenges of financial planning in your rural business 5 Replies

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Jul 30, 2009.

Buying the adjacent/adjoining property, to add to your own. 9 Replies

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Jul 30, 2009.

Creating new money from nothing 15 Replies

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Ray Jamieson Jul 17, 2009.

Creating more money by starting with just a little of it 1 Reply

Started by Ray Jamieson. Last reply by Deborah Willis Jul 16, 2009.

Blog Posts

Restore Australia petition

Posted by kate wade on April 12, 2013 at 9:12pm — 4 Comments

THE SHEEPLE OF HUMANITY

Posted by Colin Uebergang on March 2, 2013 at 4:36am — 1 Comment

© 2013   Created by Rob Moore.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service