Real People - facing the forgotten issues with friendship and a little fun.
This last week a landowner, Trent Hindman, from Wyandra in Qld was fined $110,000 plus court costs not for broadacre clearing but for selectively removing an invasive woody weed called turkey bush. Trent’s aim was to by mechanical means return the land to its natural state of semi-open grassland. Left alone the land would have remained a near complete loss of to any productive values and in a sub-standard state if measured in terms of fauna & flora bio-diversity.
To gain a good background of the situation that Trent finds himself in, please take the time to follow this link to an article at the online site Beef Central –Cattleman to appeal $110,000 clearing fine [click here]
Below is a media release from Property Rights Australia and following that a youtube made by Trent Hindman that helps you understand the prior state of the landscape and reasons why Trent believed he needed to manage the land via mechanical intervention.
Media Release
9th December 2011
Chairman of Property Rights Australia, Joanne Rea has claimed that the recent fine of $110,000 plus costs imposed on South West landowner Trent Hindman for renovating country degraded by Turkey Bush (Eremophila Gilesii) so that the native grasses could be allowed to regrow shows the unacceptable activism of some government officers.
Remarks in court by Andrew Franks of the Queensland herbarium that if native grasses were allowed to grow, livestock would be run on the country and livestock cause erosion, are extraordinary.
Under the law as it stands not only are livestock not illegal, but the growing of livestock is the very purpose for which leasehold land rental is paid to the State Government in Queensland by leaseholders including Mr. Hindman.
Much was also made of the fact that Mr. Hindman admitted that he had attempted to plant Buffel grass, a non-native grass which is excellent for preventing erosion but proved unsuitable for his area. Buffel grass is also not illegal in Queensland but leaseholders are being discriminated against for having this productive grass in their paddocks. This discrimination is unacceptable. To paraphrase one of the Justices in a previous Vegetation Management case “DERM (with apologies to the original author) may have said this but the parliament did not.”
According to Mr. Franks the clearing of native vegetation tends towards “landscape fragmentation, habitat loss, weed invasion, soil loss, loss of nutrient cycling increased greenhouse gases and a range of other effects.”
Property Rights Australia Chairman, Joanne Rea said that it is very important to understand that this very general list of Mr Franks was in fact evident before clearing because of land degradation caused by the invasive nature of Turkey Bush and many of these effects would have been vastly improved by Mr. Hindman’s treatment as can be seen from the pre-treatment photograph.
Mr. Hindman bought the property intending to return it as closely as possible to its pre-settlement state of semi-open grassland with predominately scattered box trees. As seen in this second photograph the area taken at the time of clearing and before the native grasses regenerated, the area in question was not broad-acre cleared but rather cleared very selectively to return it to a more natural state.
Joanne Rea said that it is of great concern to Property Rights Australia that DERM has taken the path of prosecution for clearing invasive species against the landowner Trent Hindman and that it has allowed some officers decision making to be influenced by unprofessional activism.
It must be remembered that the green Turkey Bush at Mr. Hindman’s property today was not part of the original landscape and has totally degraded the productive capacity of the affected land.
Property Rights Australia advocates that this degraded land be returned to its original pre-European floristic vegetation mix and tree density,if the landowner so desires .
UPDATE #1
NATIVE VEGETATION FIELD DAY: Trent Hindman will host a native vegetation field day at Alpha Station, 12km east of Wyandra on the Elimina Road, on March 14, from 10am-12pmfollowed by lunch. The field day will include a before and after paddock walk showing an area of turkey bush infestation followed by open grassy woodland. A stick raking demonstration will also be included on a thinning-permit area. A meeting of the Mulga Fighting Fund will follow in the Wyandra Hotel at 7pm.
Tags: DERM, PRA, bush, clearing, fines, property, rights, turkey, weed, woody
Permalink Reply by Joanne Rea on March 31, 2012 at 10:18am Considering that the prosecution tried to discredit Trent for experimenting (unsuccesfully) with Buffel which is definitely NOT illegal but disliked by some departmental activists, I thought all of you on this thread might want to apply for this contract. TIC.
It involves removing Buffel from Uluru by hand. The money they're offering won't even pay for the deisel.
http://www.nrmjobs.com.au/index.php/search?g=4222951
Permalink Reply by Dale Stiller on April 8, 2012 at 4:27pm Adding a scanned newspaper article from QCL 22nd of March in which Trent's case is mention by veteran rural advocate Gus McGown. Gus makes the point of landowners under the act aren’t allowed to make an honest mistake; if you don’t have the piece of paper or even the correct piece of paper you are prosecuted. He makes the point that in Trent’s case he actually reversed land degradation. Also mentioned in this article is another prosecution in the mulgalands, that of the Scriven family.
Permalink Reply by Rory Donnellan on April 9, 2012 at 3:49pm There seems to be a growing campaign among greenie extremists to have buffel grass listed as a declared weed, whilst continuing their push to ensure all woody weeds become protected species. Reduce the arable land, and you reduce the food supply. Contrived food shortages justify the aggressive population control measures they always had in mind.
Joanne Rea said:
Considering that the prosecution tried to discredit Trent for experimenting (unsuccesfully) with Buffel which is definitely NOT illegal but disliked by some departmental activists, I thought all of you on this thread might want to apply for this contract. TIC.
It involves removing Buffel from Uluru by hand. The money they're offering won't even pay for the deisel.
http://www.nrmjobs.com.au/index.php/search?g=4222951
Just Grounds Community is a social network
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Ian Macrae Yeates Apr 27.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Rory Donnellan Apr 9.
Started by Michaelng Clayton. Last reply by lorraine hogan Apr 7.
Started by John Michelmore. Last reply by Greg Blackmore Feb 3.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Ilana Yael Leeds Jan 31.
Started by Greg Blackmore. Last reply by Michael Petterson Jan 21.
Started by Greg Blackmore Jan 20.
Started by Greg Blackmore. Last reply by Joanne Rea Jan 20.
Started by Joanne Rea Jan 18.
Started by Dale Stiller Jan 15.
Started by Dale Stiller Jan 13.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Dale Stiller Jan 13.
Started by Jim Fryar. Last reply by Lynette McDougall Jan 10.
Started by Michael Petterson Jan 10.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Joanne Rea Jan 7.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Ian Macrae Yeates Jan 7.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Michael Petterson Jan 6.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Dale Stiller Jan 4.
Started by Dale Stiller. Last reply by Roger Rankin Crook Jan 2.
Started by Dale Stiller Dec 26, 2011.
Posted by Peter Malcolm Crawford on April 28, 2012 at 11:17am — 1 Comment
Posted by Terry S. Singeltary Sr. on April 25, 2012 at 8:05am — 4 Comments
Posted by Ian Macrae Yeates on April 22, 2012 at 7:36pm — 5 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on April 21, 2012 at 3:01am — 5 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on April 20, 2012 at 5:17pm — 18 Comments
© 2012 Created by Rob Moore.
Powered by
.