Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Alyn Roule on October 9, 2012 at 6:13am

Can the Law Society and / or Attorneys General intervene ??

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 9, 2012 at 9:51am

They can but they do not because it is a government contrived obligation. There are no justifications for it, because the electorate is weak and the elected representative wants to do what they want to achieve: 

"We point out this crime, this disgrace, this contemptible species of inhumanity. There is no defence to the charge of lawyers acquiescing to the denial of their duty to find The Whole Truth and their profiting from, and being party to, the abuse and imprisonment of innumerable masses of innocent citizens." Read the source of this quote at: http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign4.htm#lawyers

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 9, 2012 at 11:21am

The common people do not understand the law well and therefore do not understand why they keep losing their case.  The common law is for the people and is based on common sense.  Common sense will tell that it is not right for them to lose a case when they should be winning and they just simply do not understand why the courts work in the reverse order as dictated by the common sense of the common people.  Therefore the common people have lost their sovereignty to a non-independent judiciary.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 9, 2012 at 11:24am

Therefore if you wish to do a common good that will only work through the ballot box, please sign these petitions: 

http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/The_West_Australia_Judiciary_imple...

http://www.change.org/petitions/shire-rates-issues-for-the-people-o... 

 

Nicholas N Chin said:

The common people do not understand the law well and therefore do not understand why they keep losing their case.  The common law is for the people and is based on common sense.  Common sense will tell that it is not right for them to lose a case when they should be winning and they just simply do not understand why the courts work in the reverse order as dictated by the common sense of the common people.  Therefore the common people have lost their sovereignty to a non-independent judiciary.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 9, 2012 at 11:28am

"The educated people who comprise the ‘legal profession’ are, by their acquiescence and continued participation in the unlawful, tyrannical, perverted processes of today, more to blame than any other group in society for the destruction of the Constitutional Justice System" Source: http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign4.htm#lawyers

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Larry Wilson on October 9, 2012 at 4:11pm

I would suggest that a "petition" is the action of a slave whereas a "Peoples Directive" is the action of soverign people and individuals.

As for the Courts, are they a Chapter III (Aust. Constitution) Court or operating in a pseudo jurisdiction, usurping and perverting the rights of the Australian People. (retoric question :-)   )

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 9, 2012 at 4:52pm

Get on with the People's Directive, Larry as you are the master of the situation.  As for the Courts, I would believe they are operating in the pseudo jurisdiction.  Get the people's power to move them away.  

Larry Wilson said:

I would suggest that a "petition" is the action of a slave whereas a "Peoples Directive" is the action of soverign people and individuals.

As for the Courts, are they a Chapter III (Aust. Constitution) Court or operating in a pseudo jurisdiction, usurping and perverting the rights of the Australian People. (retoric question :-)   )

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dr Caroline Wright on October 13, 2012 at 7:13pm

Nicholas N Chin said:

I have signed both.

Therefore if you wish to do a common good that will only work through the ballot box, please sign these petitions: 

http://www.avaaz.org/en/petition/The_West_Australia_Judiciary_imple...

http://www.change.org/petitions/shire-rates-issues-for-the-people-o... 

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 13, 2012 at 10:00pm

Thank you Dr. Wright.  Let your magnanimity and your good sense of understanding of what is a Fair Go for Australians be the Guiding Light (from the Divine Providence, WHOEVER you and all Australians may take Him to be) be contagious for all Australians:  May they be inspired that: 

1) the common majority can be wrong;

2) the political ideals of the common majority have caused and engendered the subconscious behavior of judges, who have made me their victims; 

3)  the political ideals of the common majority are defying reason and logic.

4)  the common majority are keeping their victims like me beguiled at an autistic level of consciousness that the majority is right and can do no wrong. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nicholas N Chin on October 13, 2012 at 11:29pm

The subconscious behavior of the judges is characterized by their fawning and patronizing attitude that makes them deliver judgments that please the unreasoning policies of the common majority.  The common majority are pliant to the elite's common interests.  That is the reason why lawyers are not allowed to win the cases of their meritorious clients.  The decision of the judges are geared to protect the interests of the political masters i.e. those who wield the most powers. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff Forster on October 14, 2012 at 6:15am

Nicholas N Chin said:

The subconscious behavior of the judges is characterized by their fawning and patronizing attitude that makes them deliver judgments that please the unreasoning policies of the common majority.  The common majority are pliant to the elite's common interests.  That is the reason why lawyers are not allowed to win the cases of their meritorious clients.  The decision of the judges are geared to protect the interests of the political masters i.e. those who wield the most powers. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff Forster on October 14, 2012 at 6:25am

Jeff Forster said:

Totally agree with  proir  comments , This is the case with People v Banks , Why then has there been no cases won against Banks in QLD ?

  And why are people advised  to go to Federal Courts ?

Nicholas N Chin said:

The subconscious behavior of the judges is characterized by their fawning and patronizing attitude that makes them deliver judgments that please the unreasoning policies of the common majority.  The common majority are pliant to the elite's common interests.  That is the reason why lawyers are not allowed to win the cases of their meritorious clients.  The decision of the judges are geared to protect the interests of the political masters i.e. those who wield the most powers. 

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page