Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Sarah Lamonte on May 23, 2012 at 2:00pm

Population grows: France: 1.8 children/family, muslims : 8.0/family

30% of children age 20 and younger are islamic, but in lager cities like Marseilles, Paris that number has grown to 45%. By 2020 1 in 5 French will be muslim. According to the statistics, In about 40 years France will be an islamic republic.

Good luck to France, and to Europe. They'll need it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by vivienne skeen on May 23, 2012 at 10:30pm

It's the same the world over, Mark Steyn has written 2 books on the subject America Alone and After America. It will be the same here.

Sarah Lamonte said:

Population grows: France: 1.8 children/family, muslims : 8.0/family

30% of children age 20 and younger are islamic, but in lager cities like Marseilles, Paris that number has grown to 45%. By 2020 1 in 5 French will be muslim. According to the statistics, In about 40 years France will be an islamic republic.

Good luck to France, and to Europe. They'll need it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sarah Lamonte on May 24, 2012 at 1:31pm

We're still very lucky here, we're far away, but doesn't mean we won't get it sooner or later. But it will be a huge problem for the next generation....unless you guys...you heard what he said, start with 4 wives and 7-8 kids (each!) ;-)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jeff Hutcho on May 24, 2012 at 3:28pm

Hi Sarah

That concept should go down well with the population reduction meme that is present in the AGW crew, including WWF, John Holdren Obama's science adviser and various others.

Take what is happening in India at present, with paid/coerced incentives for sterilisation, male or female.

Or the extreme - "Save the Planet, kill yourself" movement in the US.

http://spectator.org/blog/2009/04/21/life-after-people-save-the-pla

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Davies on May 25, 2012 at 9:21pm

When will a political party wake up? http://www.eyeontheun.org/view.asp?p=55&l=11

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Martin Essenberg on May 26, 2012 at 8:48pm

Pauline Hanson and One Nation was concerned about asian immigrations back in 1996- but got howled down as racists. Tony Abbott organised slush funds to destroy ON so don't expect him to fix it.

The major parties will NOT wake up- they are BEHIND continued excessive immigration.
 
Ian Davies said:

When will a political party wake up? http://www.eyeontheun.org/view.asp?p=55&l=11

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Stephen Cox on May 28, 2012 at 11:28pm

When people become concerned at changes happening in their homelands we need to realise the critical numbers are far lower than we at first think regardless of what group is involved.

For Instance the Greens poll relatively low numbers yet have had an inordinate influence on the Politics of the current shambles we have for a Government.

As others have posted the Muslim vote was enough to swing the vote in France toward a group that empower the Islamist ideals,Exactly the same has happened elsewhere in Europe including Denmark and is a wakeup call for many as they do not need large numbers to take control just compliant people usually from the Left side of Politics who seem hell bent on commiting suicide as long as they can take others down as well.

After all Conservative or Right of Centre people who see this expansion as a Political threat to the Status Quo are likely the only ones who could fit into an Islamic Society.

Those from the Left who promote and aid this change to occur across the Western world are in actual fact those with a lifestyle likely to be the most repressed by Sharia Law,Certainly makes you wonder at the Left side of Politics who seem hell bent on mutual destruction.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Stephen Cox on May 29, 2012 at 9:28pm

This Document should be of Interest it was the Islamic Union Declaration on Human Rights circa early 1990's where it becomes interesting is at first glance many will agree with what is purported as being a good positive ideal,However when you read through it and begin to Realise that Sharia trumps everything but Allah as the Supreme instrument of Control over how we should live and treat others.

It is when veiled threats as to how Death may be dealt out in accordance to whatever guidelines are within Sharia Law among other aspects that the platitudes handed to the United Nations become visable as simply a Smokescreen and that in truth under Islam Sharia over rules all but the Strictures of life as given by Allah which are of course written into Sharia.

So therefore we have a Document tabled at the UN that in truth as borne out by following years of actions we have all been witness to either directly or indirectly is not worth the paper it would have originally been printed apon.

Attachments:

• cairo-declaration-islam-93e.pdf, 606 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Stephen Cox on June 1, 2012 at 1:41am

Noor Inayat Khan GC,not a name many know but A Muslim Indian woman who Died for us during WW2 and who was first recognised by The Awarding of the George Cross and The Croix De Guerre by Britain and France respectively.

Noor has also been recognised By Israel along with many other Muslims for the efforts they made to Help the Jews hide from and escape the Nazi's.

Yet other Muslims were instrumental in becoming members of the SS,They were sadly more in the majority though little known and brushed from History deliberately.

The story of Noor Inayat Khan is worth reading about her Bravery should be remembered and there is a lesson for us in Modern times Not all Muslims are a threat to us but they must accept Australia as it is,That is how Noor's family accepted the places they lived,Noor was of the Sufi Muslim sect and they are avowed Non Violent Muslims who also are obliged to speak only Truth.

In Noor's case when captured and Tortured for over a year by the Gestapo for information rather than betray those around her or trying to Lie to the Gestapo something impossible for her she simply said nothing,Even those from the Gestapo after the War stated she above all people made the greatest impression apon them.

We must remember it is the Politics of the Religion more than the people that are the issue,For it is the Politics that drive the people whether they realise it or not and the Politics is what we do not approve of.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ruth Bonnett on June 1, 2012 at 5:55am

I have been called a 'kaffir' in the lift in my own home. (I learned later that was a grave insult). One sign of extremism is the wearing of the full face garb: the niqab or the burka.  I did confront one of these women so attired, and asked her why she wanted to go around in disguise.  She said it was her religion, as if that was a free pass to do what she pleased.  I said if we changed the law, would she leave and wear the veil or stay and take the veil off?  She said "yes". Cunning.  I could hardly hear her through the veil, and I made a bit of a fuss about saying "pardon" to everything she said.  It was quite insightful.  In my view we should not accept the full veil. Full stop.  Even the hijab is or has been banned in some moderate Islamic states, because at least they know that the veil is as much political as it is 'religious'.  Maybe even more.

http://tombalderston.wordpress.com/2010/11/29/understanding-islam-p...

In Afghanistan the Burqa all but disappeared in the early 20^th century.

“Turkey banned the Islamic face veil and turban in 1934, and this prohibition has been maintained ever since by a long succession of governments that adhered to Atatürk’s secularist and modernist revolution,” according to Chesler.  This has been the case until only recently, after 2008 “women wearing both hijab and burqa have been seen on the streets of Istanbul.”

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Stephen Cox on June 1, 2012 at 9:56pm

Ruth there is much misinformation and deliberately so from those in Islam who wish to confront regarding Face Coverings,It is not a religous requirement but an Arab Cultural throwback in fact.

It is used as a means of control as Arab society is extreme when it comes to being Patriachal based,But as for the Burqa and face Veils the use was different  historically.

The Face veil was used more as a tease so to speak indoors and is allied more with the Arab Harem side of Society,Today it is a more moderate garb for everyday use.

 

The Burqa however actually traces it's roots back to a time when the political games we see today were less subtle and it's real use stems from the many Bedouin Tribes that wandered the Desert,It was simply a practical way of adressing the not so infrequent sand storms of the Middle East and North Africa.

 

So even though many of Arab decent are urbanised today the Burqa represents a cultural lifeline a statement of tribal solidarity and continuing comfort in familiar ways.

Much like the various patterns on Arab Mens scarves and headgear represent various tribal ethnicities even though it seems unfamiliar and therefore is percieved as threatening or unsettling by people of the West,When you think about it there are similarities between the Scots and their various Tartans and the Arabs and their various tribal identities each choose to display as a security blanket.

 

Though you may percieve a smug threatening aspect from some encounters,you can counter that by pointing out they are the ones acting as would a frightened Child or a threatened wild Animal.

Hence why we see so many younger people of all backgrounds in Gangs or Groups,They are displaying their fear even though they do not realise that fact.

Throw that at them next time and see them step back and act confused when confronted with a truth they know to be fact but have not had the courage to admit to themselves.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Martin Essenberg on June 2, 2012 at 5:08am

So which politician in Australia has called for restrictions on the immigration to Australia of foreigners?

 

The ALP of 1901 did with the implementation of the White Australia Policy.

As did Pauline Hanson in 1996

 

So which politican or political group is addressing the issue of immigration today? Certainly not the Julia, the  ALP,  or Tony Abbot, the LNP or Greens. For the major parties and members immigration is NOT on the agenda so you migtht as well forget about trying to get them to support a restriction on immigration or any segment of the immigration intake.

So where does the Katter party stand?

Perhaps you had all better join One nation. At least you know they would do it.

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page