Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by james darby on November 7, 2011 at 2:48pm

Hi Jan, When the name of Charities was stealthfully changed to "Not For Profit" the programe of socialists became clear. 'Charity' is good. Charity gives the giver the pleasure of giving and aids the person being given to. Charity provides motivation for many to keep producing an abundance so that the productive person can fullfill their natural desire to share. Socialists want the poor and disadvantaged to reply on Government. When Gillard forshadowed a "Flood Levy" tax to help rebuild Qld the wonderful flow of aid goods and money from charitable Aussies stemmed to a tiny trickle. Government has not the heart to organise the distribution of charity. Please correct my approximate figures regarding the deplorable conduct of the Labor Qld Govt that still (illegally) holds $185m of undistributed public donations.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by vivienne skeen on November 7, 2011 at 6:03pm

Malcolm Turnbull is a disgusting piece of work. Tony Abbott should show courage and sack Turnbull now!

Mind you TA should have stuck with his original assessment regarding the "IPCC science" as 'CRAP' If that had been the case the Coalition would have been able to swamp Labor and the Greens with the massive amount of real science coming out. They are all fools

Denise Scanlan said:

MT says a lot of stupid things and this is one of them. Now who wants the idiot as leader of the Opposition. He cannot be trusted. He does think he is better than the rest of us. This goes down with the comment he made regarding people who voted no to the referendum.

Ian D said:

So does M.T think all skeptics are ........   .........?

Opposition frontbencher Malcolm Turnbull has compared climate change sceptics with people who refuse to admit smoking causes lung cancer.

http://au.news.yahoo.com/a/-/latest/11413599/climate-sceptics-like-...

 

This story appears to be on a number of media sites. He is the LNP's  K.R ! A lot in common maybe the two of them could form their own party & call it the Socialist Republican Party.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by vivienne skeen on November 7, 2011 at 6:35pm

I have signed. Vivienne

Denise Scanlan said:

I got this in an email this morning. Is it fair dinkum?

 

 

Axe the Tax with FACTS

 

Derek Smith has received  a response from Buckingham Palace in reply to his request to have the Queen intervene to disallow the carbon tax legislation.  The letter states that the Queen will act on advice from her Ministers and we hope this includes shadow ministers.

 

The intent is now to demonstrate to our politicians of all colours, that the electorate wants the Queen to act in this matter.

 

Accordingly, Derek has arranged for a petition  to be signed by as many people as we can muster, to influence our politicians (principally of course those in the Coalition) to advise the Queen that this legislation goes directly against the principles of democracy, seeing the Prime Minister was elected on a policy specifically ruling out that such a tax was planned.

 

Please sign the petition and let your local Federal member know that you have done so.  Also, please pass this on to as many people as you can.

 

Thank you!

The Galileo Movement

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael Petterson on November 7, 2011 at 7:42pm

If everyone can rebroadcast it and tell people about it,as much as possible,as it really needs more signatures to be seriously considered.

vivienne skeen said:

I have signed. Vivienne

Denise Scanlan said:

I got this in an email this morning. Is it fair dinkum?

 

 

Axe the Tax with FACTS

 

Derek Smith has received  a response from Buckingham Palace in reply to his request to have the Queen intervene to disallow the carbon tax legislation.  The letter states that the Queen will act on advice from her Ministers and we hope this includes shadow ministers.

 

The intent is now to demonstrate to our politicians of all colours, that the electorate wants the Queen to act in this matter.

 

Accordingly, Derek has arranged for a petition  to be signed by as many people as we can muster, to influence our politicians (principally of course those in the Coalition) to advise the Queen that this legislation goes directly against the principles of democracy, seeing the Prime Minister was elected on a policy specifically ruling out that such a tax was planned.

 

Please sign the petition and let your local Federal member know that you have done so.  Also, please pass this on to as many people as you can.

 

Thank you!

The Galileo Movement

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jan Courtney on November 7, 2011 at 9:01pm

You know James,  I've been wondering about that "flood tax" -  who is getting the benefit of it ? (or need I ask)  It certainly doesn't seem to be the flood victims. 

james darby said:

Hi Jan, When the name of Charities was stealthfully changed to "Not For Profit" the programe of socialists became clear. 'Charity' is good. Charity gives the giver the pleasure of giving and aids the person being given to. Charity provides motivation for many to keep producing an abundance so that the productive person can fullfill their natural desire to share. Socialists want the poor and disadvantaged to reply on Government. When Gillard forshadowed a "Flood Levy" tax to help rebuild Qld the wonderful flow of aid goods and money from charitable Aussies stemmed to a tiny trickle. Government has not the heart to organise the distribution of charity. Please correct my approximate figures regarding the deplorable conduct of the Labor Qld Govt that still (illegally) holds $185m of undistributed public donations.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on November 7, 2011 at 10:33pm

Thank you Denise for Posting the Link for the Petition to Her Majesty courtesy of the Galileo Movement. I could not help myself as I signed and wrote

Unmandated, underhand, deceptive and fraudulent redistribution tax and UN for World Government funding scheme that has no modelling for breakdown in Chinese raw material purchases due to collapsing Western markets. Labor Pollies claim "For a low carbon future with only the big polluters paying." All typical Gillard/Wong lies. Reducing 1.4% of carbon by 5% equals Global reduction by .07% at a cost of $66,000 per year for every Australian resident.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on November 7, 2011 at 10:38pm

Hi Jan, Yes the 'Flood Tax' was/is one of Gillard's Big Big lies. The flood tax is to rebuild infastructure, nothing for victims. And what is also terrible is that Gillard was forced to give Vinnies $30m after declaring the 'Flood Tax or Vinnies would have collapsed and the work they would have been unable to complete could have cost the Govt $300m. Turnbull says nothing. He only hopes that Australia will hang together long enough for the ETS to kick in.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on November 7, 2011 at 10:57pm

Hi Vivien, I went to find some material I wrote at the time of Turnbull announcing his retirement. There is quite a bit so I Posting up some of it. I am yet to disagree with anything that you have said.

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: James Darby <jamesdarby@y7mail.com>
To: tony Abbottt <tony.abbott.mp@aph.gov.au>
Sent: Wed, 2 June, 2010 12:01:20 PM
Subject: Fw: MINERS AD CAMPAIGN WRONG 010510

Hi Tony Abbott,

 

So far I have to say I have predicted the outcomes of your five steps to the left.

1/ An ill thought out response to Rudd and Turnbull's ETS

2/ Maternity Leave Policy

3/ Climbing into bed with Kevin Rudd over "Unfair Dismissal".

4/ Advocating a vast increase in the Public Service to plan massive unnatural population increase and failing to hear Australians' concerns over immigration levels.

5/  Not expelling Turnbull the moment of his announcment of leaving Parliament and setting a speedy presleection date for Wentworth.

 

I expect the same pathetic response from your office that I have received on each occassion I have written to you.

 

You don't read your mail and now if you were to choose to read the correspondence from me it would take you several hours.

 

I have not found anyone who writes to you that does not get the same inane response.

 

There is no alternative non-socialist Party that has the capacity to create sufficent votes to allow you to win against Rudd with preferences. I know few Liberals who will go beyond perfunctory performence as you have motivated no one at at time when every small business should have your photo in their window.

 

You will surpass Hewson in losing the unlosable election as things stand.

 

Turn right not turn bull.

 

Yours sincerely

 

jamesdarby@y7mail.com 2nd June 2010

 

SOME RECENT POSTS: 

 

Kevin Rudd is taking the Miners on a goose chase. Rudd has no intention of sticking to a Super Tax on Miners.

 

1/ Rudd dropped the ETS to pull Turnbull back into the Parliament.

2/ Rudd introduced a Super Tax on Miners to stimulate the socialist advocates and to exhaust the miners opposition to Labor. i.e. The Miners had there chance to support less socialist Howard in 2007 and they blew it. Again the Miners' Organisations did little to oppose the ETS. The Miners are active now with their advertising campaign which has provided the Labor Govt with the excuse to spread socialist tripe at taxpayer expense.

3/  Rudd intends to dump the Miners Tax and bring on the ETS after naming the Election Date.

4/ The Miners where virtually silent in opposition to the ETS as they believed that rationalisation is good (except for those on the lower rungs) and that the secretly offered Royalty concessions would be valuable.

5/ The miners are susceptible to public opinion and this may have been a reason why the miners' organisations did little to oppose the ETS.

6/  The miners' add campaign is ill conceived by persons who do not understand political campaign systems and people influencing techniques.

 7/ The ETS will be just as devasting for Aust as the miners tax.

8/   In the unlikely event that Rudd keeps the Miners Tax and does not bring back the ETS Rudd will still flog the miners as the Miners do not know how to defeat Rudd and are in fact assisting Rudd with their anti-tax ad campaign.

 

In recent times I have reproduced some of my correspondence to Abbott in an endeavour to bring him back on tract.

 

Abbott is not going to come back on tract to beat Rudd and Rudd must be defeated at the next election.

 

 

 

James Darby 2nd June 2010

0406 553 333

 

 

(I have posted Political Views on "Agmates" - "Punch" - "Menzies House" )

 

 

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

FACE BOOK POST 1st June 2010 http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=103677749679905

 No Wayne, losing an argument is NOT a national emergency.'s Wall.

James Darby I wrote the below to give explanation as to why Rudd put the ETS on the backburner. As things stand after the Miners (finally and badly) run out their campaign against Rudd's 'Tax on Miners' I predict. Shortly after the naming of the election date Rudd will dump the "Miners Tax" and reintroduce the ETS. Rudd kept Turnbull in Parliamnet to help.

See more

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Davies on November 8, 2011 at 6:25am

Hi Peter, does make you wonder about the direction of the QLD LNP, down. Plenty of negative stories out there on the net on them.  Looks like Qld will stay ALP/Greens if others don't get it together.

Cheers.

Peter Heuscher said:

Hi Ian,

I had a look at this "nationalone" and it seems to me pretty radical. I could agree with them on the issue of immigration and border protection - but the whole islam-fascist part seems to me far to hotblooded.
I don't think they will have many followers, the "manifesto" is so hewn in stone that it is hard to identify with it - as is.

Cheers.

Ian D said:

Hi Peter, just stumbled upon this. Close to you I belive.

http://www.nationalone.org/manifesto.html

Stephen Barber has been elected an LNP Regional Secretary in Queensland’s idyllic Sunshine Coast area.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on November 8, 2011 at 9:11am

Hi Ian D. Thankyou for the super link http://www.nationalone.org/manifesto.html

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Davies on November 8, 2011 at 10:23am

Hi James, LOL! I was getting mixed up with Dr Stephen Barber (Stamitil required) G20, the two of them look very similiar. A little extra digging on LNP Stephen Barber, now I am relaxed.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on November 9, 2011 at 11:23am

I have been weeping for West PNG all my life. The passing of the OWG Socialist Greens Carbon Tax Laws through the Senate is the completion of another step of Gillard's Plan. Implemented so stealthfully by Juliar when she called the last election early (8mths) to benefit the Greens and ensure extra Greens Senators in the Senate to complete her Mistress plan to take my Australia into Asia. Instead of working to free the different  peoples annexed by Indonesia, Gillard plans to make Australia part of Indonesia on the Greens march to OWG.   I cry for my Nation. Tony Windsor and Malcolm Turnbull have zero respect from me. 

• ▶ Reply

▶ Reply to Discussion

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 24
• 25
• 26
• 27
• 28
• …
• 34
• Next ›
• Page