Real People - facing the forgotten issues with friendship and a little fun.
The Heartland Institute, a body that has been very successful in exposing the AGW hoax, is under attack from the blogs like Desmog; blogs whose raison d'etre is to try to besmear scientists and organisations that are revealing the truth of the hoax.
Heartland has issued this statement:
Heartland Institute responds to stolen and fake documents FEBRUARY 15, 2012 – The following statement from The Heartland Institute – a free-market think tank – may be used for attribution.
Yesterday afternoon, two advocacy groups posted online several documents they claimed were The Heartland Institute’s 2012 budget, fundraising, and strategy plans. Some of these documents were stolen from Heartland, at least one is a fake, and some may have been altered.
The stolen documents appear to have been written by Heartland’s president for a board meeting that took place on January 17. He was traveling at the time this story broke yesterday afternoon and still has not had the opportunity to read them all to see if they were altered. Therefore, the authenticity of those documents has not been confirmed. Since then, the documents have been widely reposted on the Internet, again with no effort to confirm their authenticity. One document, titled “Confidential Memo: 2012 Heartland Climate Strategy,” is a total fake apparently intended to defame and discredit The Heartland Institute. It was not written by anyone associated with The Heartland Institute. It does not express Heartland’s goals, plans, or tactics. It contains several obvious and gross misstatements of fact. We respectfully ask all activists, bloggers, and other journalists to immediately remove all of these documents and any quotations taken from them, especially the fake “climate strategy” memo and any quotations from the same, from their blogs, Web sites, and publications, and to publish retractions. The individuals who have commented so far on these documents did not wait for Heartland to confirm or deny the authenticity of the documents. We believe their actions constitute civil and possibly criminal offenses for which we plan to pursue charges and collect payment for damages, including damages to our reputation. We ask them in particular to immediately remove these documents and all statements about them from the blogs, Web sites, and publications, and to publish retractions. How did this happen? The stolen documents were obtained by an unknown person who fraudulently assumed the identity of a Heartland board member and persuaded a staff member here to “re-send” board materials to a new email address. Identity theft and computer fraud are criminal offenses subject to imprisonment. We intend to find this person and see him or her put in prison for these crimes.
Apologies: The Heartland Institute apologizes to the donors whose identities were revealed by this theft. We promise anonymity to many of our donors, and we realize that the major reason these documents were stolen and faked was to make it more difficult for donors to support our work. We also apologize to Heartland staff, directors, and our allies in the fight to bring sound science to the global warming debate, who have had their privacy violated and their integrity impugned. Lessons: Disagreement over the causes, consequences, and best policy responses to climate change runs deep. We understand that. But honest disagreement should never be used to justify the criminal acts and fraud that occurred in the past 24 hours.
As a matter of common decency and journalistic ethics, we ask everyone in the climate change debate to sit back and think about what just happened. Those persons who posted these documents and wrote about them before we had a chance to comment on their authenticity should be ashamed of their deeds, and their bad behavior should be taken into account when judging their credibility now and in the future. The Heartland Institute is a 28-year-old national nonprofit organization with offices in Chicago, Illinois and Washington, DC. Its mission is to discover, develop, and promote free-market solutions to social and economic problems. For more information, visit our Web site at http://www.heartland.org

At the same time our own Professor Bob Carter is under attack for receiving some funds from Heartland. In the alarmist Fairfax press, Carter "did not deny he was being paid by The Heartland Institute, but would not confirm the amount, or if the think tank expected anything in return for its money."
"That suggestion is silly and offensive - a kindergarten level argument," Professor Carter told Fairfax.
Perhaps Ben Cubby would like to examine funding for blogs that try to blur the truth such as DeSmog and Skeptical Science. Perhaps Ben Cubby would be interested in the peanuts that Heartland receives (2011 - $4.6M) compared with Warmist Alarmist organisations like Greenpeace US$300m, WWF $700m. For more see Jo Nova's list HERE.
Tags:
Permalink Reply by Dale Stiller on February 21, 2012 at 2:10pm There has been a confession to the leaking and forgery of documents from the Heartland Institute.
As reported by Andrew Bolt, Heartland leaker confesses
The warmist who leaked the Heartland Insitute documents - including the key forged one - has confessed.
He’s Peter Gleick from the Pacific Institute, dedicated to “bring opposing groups together” by, it seems, peddling forgeries (which Gleick insists were not his own work):
Speaking not of Gleick but others… If global warming is seen as such a grim battle against evil that you can use such tricks, might not others feel entitled to fudge a little evidence? Hide a decline?
Bolta has sourced much of his story from Anthony Watt's blog WUWT, BREAKING: Gleick Confesses
Anothony Watts has a lot more detail & in his last update he advises that the Heartland Institude will soon issue a statement.
Permalink Reply by Rae Billett on February 22, 2012 at 4:51pm Here here me too.
Darryl Ross Pedersen said:
This is tipical of the Australian Media, taking everything out of context, I wonder if the journalists would work without pay? Bob Carter has as much right to earn a living as any one else. I'm with Cate on this one I would back Bob Carter anyday
Cate Stuart said:Pffft! I will back Bob Carter anyday of the week! Bring it it on!
I loved Bob's reply,
"That suggestion is silly and offensive - a kindergarten level argument," Professor Carter told Fairfax.
Looks like they are all grasping at straws to me, gee, wonder why they are so worried ~ people not as gullible as they once were, and the world is not going to self destruct?! What a surprise :)
Cheers Cate :)
Permalink Reply by Rae Billett on February 22, 2012 at 4:53pm They can't get away with that sort of thing now. The sooner they get the message that no one is buying the BS the better.
Give me Bob Carter's logic any day.
Dale Stiller said:
There has been a confession to the leaking and forgery of documents from the Heartland Institute.
As reported by Andrew Bolt, Heartland leaker confesses
The warmist who leaked the Heartland Insitute documents - including the key forged one - has confessed.
He’s Peter Gleick from the Pacific Institute, dedicated to “bring opposing groups together” by, it seems, peddling forgeries (which Gleick insists were not his own work):
Speaking not of Gleick but others… If global warming is seen as such a grim battle against evil that you can use such tricks, might not others feel entitled to fudge a little evidence? Hide a decline?
Bolta has sourced much of his story from Anthony Watt's blog WUWT, BREAKING: Gleick Confesses
Anothony Watts has a lot more detail & in his last update he advises that the Heartland Institude will soon issue a statement.
Permalink Reply by Denise Scanlan on February 23, 2012 at 10:15am Miranda Devine has a good piece in the Telegraph.
http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/mirandadevine/index.php/dai...
Just Grounds Community is a social network
Started by Geoff Brown in Climate Change. Last reply by Stephen Cox 3 hours ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Stephen Cox 3 hours ago.
Started by Geoff Brown in General. Last reply by Stephen Cox 3 hours ago.
Started by Jan Courtney in General. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 4 hours ago.
Started by Robert William Nickisson in Politics. Last reply by Robert William Nickisson 6 hours ago.
Started by Sarah Lamonte in Health. Last reply by Sarah Lamonte 6 hours ago.
Started by John Mikkelsen in Environment. Last reply by Jeff Hutcho 7 hours ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Stephen Cox 7 hours ago.
Started by Rory Donnellan in General. Last reply by Barbara lee 8 hours ago.
Started by Ian Macrae Yeates in General. Last reply by Jan Courtney 11 hours ago.
Started by Barbara lee in General. Last reply by Barbara lee 13 hours ago.
Started by Joanne Rea in Agriculture. Last reply by Dale Stiller 13 hours ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Barbara lee 13 hours ago.
Started by Cate Stuart in General. Last reply by Jeff Hutcho 14 hours ago.
Started by Ian Macrae Yeates in General. Last reply by Ian Macrae Yeates 15 hours ago.
Started by Dale Stiller in Politics. Last reply by Barbara lee 19 hours ago.
Started by John C Fairfax in General. Last reply by Jeff Hutcho yesterday.
Started by vivienne skeen in Politics. Last reply by Stephen Cox yesterday.
Started by John Michelmore in Agriculture. Last reply by Rob Moore yesterday.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright yesterday.
Posted by Peter Malcolm Crawford on April 28, 2012 at 11:17am — 1 Comment
Posted by Terry S. Singeltary Sr. on April 25, 2012 at 8:05am — 4 Comments
Posted by Ian Macrae Yeates on April 22, 2012 at 7:36pm — 5 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on April 21, 2012 at 3:01am — 5 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on April 20, 2012 at 5:17pm — 18 Comments
© 2012 Created by Rob Moore.
Powered by
.