Just Grounds Community

For Like minded people who like to see-

Marriage

The genetic desire of a society is to perpetuate itself so that one's own genes survive and prosper into the forever future. 'Marriage' being the union between man and woman is the principle multiplier of the perpetuation of the society. "Marriage" between same sex couples achieves no purpose for the continuance of the society and can only lead to "equal" rights for same sex "marrieds' to adopt children. Whilst I am aware of children being exposed to same sex relationships being forced upon some children by their bisexual and turned homosexual natural parents no society that wishes to perpetuate itself should entertain a view that same sex couples should have rights to adopt or foster others parentless children. Homosexuals who want the right to marry as man and women have can not expect to be 'equal' unless given the OK to apply to be included in the adoption process. What homosexuals want is to feel normal when there is nothing normal about homosexuality for a society that wants to successfully perpetuate itself.

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by james darby on July 10, 2012 at 12:53pm

Thats OK Barbara. I mean about being "clearly outnumbered" Won't make the slightest differrence as the World is going that wicked way. Nothing in Australia will stop it in the long run as the school system more and more teaches the "normality" of the non-normal. All I shall attempt to do is slow it in some kind of hope that the example of the shocking failures of overseas' countries examples will further slow the slip. Turnbull does not have an unstolen thought process in his head. It is the thought bank of where Turnbull obtains his information that is the serious consideration. Name any socialist such as Flannery and you will soon be shown how Turnbull plagerises the socialists' work. Now Turnbull has his ETS his only reason for remaining in Parliament is to capture the top job. God help the family then.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on July 10, 2012 at 12:59pm

Quote from M Turnbull in from the above link "There's a greater benefit ... value for my constituents can be served by me staying within the shadow cabinet, rather than resigning and crossing the floor on every issue"

I highlight "...crossing the floor on every issue."

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rob Moore on July 10, 2012 at 1:29pm

Yes he has got to go- Peter King has a lot to answer for on many fronts.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Merv Nash on July 10, 2012 at 1:55pm

If he wants to cross the floor on every issue, why is he still in the party?

He should resign and get on with it instead of being an inside traitor.

Does he want to lead it and become a grey haired Julia delivering the same red headed policies?

Maybe he thinks there is votes to be gained at the expense of integrity like is becoming the fashion.

Make up your mind Malcolm. Are you with us or against us?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on July 11, 2012 at 11:55am

Hi Merv, In case you have not seen my blog titled "Turnbull" I do wish to draw "Turnbull" on my JGpage to your attention. 'Marriage' has a value to society in direct proportion to the preparation and education and brain input exposure to precept influences such as Penny Wong, the Simpsons and even Kevin Rudd who has a wife with a different name. Julia Gillard's "High Participation" standardised education system denies that there are two sexes and that males and females now have no defined roles. Then of course there is Malcolm Turnbull who says that same sex couples marrying will not effect his marriage with Lucy. As the value of marriage, and being married is lessened in the minds of the youth so the mumber of people who defend marriage must diminish. Malcolm Turnbull serves no value to the continuance of Australia as a Sovereign Nation and serves no one except himself and the ETS. How wonderful for Australia to have an independantly wealthy man who chose to enter Politics to reward and protect his host Australia? I know of two such politicians. The Late Sir Joh and the Late Ronald Reagan. Both wonderful, devoted family men who entered political to preserve and protect their host Nations. Turnbull for me, is the great failure and really when you think about it, any person who advocates a Republic for Australia has to be a failure for Australia.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rob Moore on July 11, 2012 at 12:58pm

James- snippet from Bob's book re Sir Joh.

The Bjelke-Petersens home was a small brick veneer bungalow, I'd say no more than than 15 squares, or 140 sq metres. The last time i visited "Bethany" was on a stiflingly hot day. I was soaking with perspiration just walking up the hill to the house.

I was very surprised tofind that the house was not air conditioned. The Qld ex premier, in his late 80's, his mind sharp but body feeble, seemed to be suffering from the heat- so was I for that matter.All the Bjelke-Petersens had was a fan that could be moved from room to room.These were the fairly humble circumstances ofthe Bjelke-Petersens.

To put this into perspective, the Sydney Morning Herald front pagedPaul Keatings$5 Million worth of private residences, and then,in a subsequent article , delineated his $8 million worth of shares in one company alone.

In 1987 Joh came under attack within his own party, and investigated through the Fitzgerald inquiry, was pushed out of the premiershipand forced out of parliament by a majority of his own party colleagues.

In the aftermath, Bjelke -Petersen was one of only three members of Parliament in the last half century to have refused the very generous superannuation entitlement available to all MP's.

Hardly the mark of a crook that all the ALP wanabe's were claiming. And of course their 20 year reign to follow has ended up with us owing $85 Billion while riding the crest of the biggest mining boom in History.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on July 11, 2012 at 1:06pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egxB0dTajb4&feature=youtu.be

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Merv Nash on July 11, 2012 at 2:04pm

Excellent Doco.

Do you remember when the world used to admire America as the greatest nation on earth? The can-do nation. When it promoted, honoured and respected high standards of behaviour?

When it had high family standards. When honour and decency were role models to be copied and respected?

In the days when sick minorities were treated with compassion but were given the best of treatment. Not accepted as the new "norm" or something be taken as a new role model or way of life.

The days when welfare was an admission of failure.

My how times have changed.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Barbara lee on July 11, 2012 at 4:05pm

Hello James, yes I did watch the U tube, I thought it was a great one. Disagree with the schools and kinda’s, with books written up for children to be read. As its clearly training the young impressionable vulnerable young minds from the word go. Its one thing if your born with a gen and can't help it, quite another to become one if talk into when clearly they've not. Its really saying its ok and quite confusing for the young child, just become one instantly without knowing what it is really. When clearly that’s setting the child up for some major headaches ahead when it all could have been avoided by not having read the childrens book in the first place. I certainly would not be reading it to my grandchild.

So those books should be not be in schools or at kinda's,

Came across another movie while in there having a look.

Dr Phil, as I really respect this guy. He always hears both sides of the story and so his doing this in these movies, part 1 is ok, but part 2 is even better, and there is a part 3.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WGb4eQRg3Y&feature=related

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Barbara lee on July 11, 2012 at 4:08pm

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Merv Nash on July 11, 2012 at 5:20pm

Wow!

There's more heat in this subject than is generated by the totality of all the alternative energy systems.

It brings to mind the old saying that, being in the right does not depend on having a loud voice.

They must feel incredibly inferior to want to pretend they are in the same relationship as is a man and a woman.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james darby on July 12, 2012 at 12:57am

Hi Barbara, You say "I certainly would not be reading it to my grandchild." The reason for this thought process is because deep down in your genes (genes instruction are stronger in women than men) you sub consciously want your genes to survive. It is a real grandmother thing. The grandmother thing is so strong it survived 40 to 70 years of socialism throughout the old USSR. The grandmothers had taught their off spring the National dance (folk) and song and how to sew the national costumes. As the murderous Soviet empire disintegrated, Estonian children danced in the streets for the first time of their lives. As did the Ukranians and the Cheks and all the other freed former Soviet States did the same. The grandmothers that had managed to keep the minds of their granddaughters focused on "become a worthy women so as to find a worthy man in this land of unworthy men" celebrated in their hearts as they knew their genes had a chance. In 1991 when I was in Moscow a schoolgirl poll determined that 50% of school leavers planned to become hookers and 50% planed to become a wife. Half the grandmothers won. You can win to when you find out the results of same gender sexual partners being given the equality to marry as man and wife has had in the unfortunate countries that have gone down the sodomy path. Merv I don't really accept that the majority of same gender sexual partners really want the right to marry and adopt children and have forced homosexual sexual practise (spell it either way) training foisted on all school children. I think that the cleaver lefties have hijaked the 'Equality in Marriage' movements and are promoting homosexuality as equality. Family and marriage and small business ownership are the greatest threat to socialism that there is and socialists attack family, marriage and small business as a life plan.