There is not enough time provided for the Australian public to read 1,100 plus pages of carbon tax legislation and give Australians just 6 days to make submissions to the inquiry, despite the massive impact this tax will have. The following is a brief response as to why this tax should not be introduced.

The science is not in as Ms Gillard continually tries to indicate this is the case. Numerous scientists disagree and dispute anthropogenic man made global warming. The United Nations IPCC was found to knowingly have peddled fraudulent science from the University of East Anglia where an insider with a conscience released damning emails on the fraud. These 1079 emails and 72 documents are evidence of a scandal involving most of the prominent scientists - a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science.

The tax is on carbon dioxide not carbon. Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.

I did not vote for this, I do not want this carbon tax introduced when there is no clear mandate by the people. Ms Gillard misled the Australian public before the August 2010 election stating 'There will be no carbon tax under the government I lead.'

The Gillard government's plan to cut out global warming emissions means by 2050 we are expected to send 57 billion dollars overseas. This means steps towards one world governance something that Bob Brown has clearly indicated in his speech on 29 June, 2011 – 'why shouldn’t we now join vigorous moves in Europe and at the United Nations for a global people’s assembly based on one person, one vote, one value? Such a global parliament - it could be right here in Australia,' said Brown.

Ms Gillard has also indicated 'new world order' and this is published on the Australian Government’s own website - Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade – Australia: A strong record and a vision for the future – A message from Prime Minister Julia Gillard - where it clearly indicates that below yet Mr. Gillard has cast assertions towards anyone who is against the tax as extremists or they are conspiracy theorists…..

'In the complex, inter-connected world in which we all live, countries cannot address the major challenges of today on their own. Australia seeks to be part of the solution to these challenges. We believe in the power of working together across national boundaries to forge creative solutions to common challenges. We respect good international citizenship. We value the United Nations as the forum that brings nations together to discuss and find ways to address peacefully the globe's most pressing challenges. The importance of the Security Council to the maintenance of international peace and security is as great now as it ever has been. Not since the founding of the United Nations have we faced such uncertain times, when the contours of a new world order are emerging but not yet apparent.'

Mark Dreyfuss who has claimed - Once the carbon change legislation is in place, he said, repeal would amount to an acquisition of property by the commonwealth, as holders of emissions permits would be deprived of a valuable asset. As a result, the commonwealth would be liable, under s.51(xxxi) of the Australian Constitution, to pay compensation, potentially in the billions of dollars. A future government would therefore find repeal prohibitively costly.

I vehemently oppose this carbon tax legislation going ahead without the consensus of all Australians.

(YOUR NAME AND CONTACT DETAILS)
Please feel free to use this generic submission, but we have to mass email this or your submission and quickly! Written submissions must be received by the 22nd of September 2011. They can be emailed to jscacefl@aph.gov.au or posted to the select committee care of Parliament House, Canberra.

I just emailed mine!