For Like minded people who like to see-
No doubt in such a conservative forum, the title of this discussion will probably be seen as rather provocative! But, it's a point of view worthy of discussion I think.
Listening to a song recently and thinking about how society has changed over my time, I have come to the conclusion that -almost without exception- conservatives always lose eventually. Yes the conservative position wins some short battles along the way, but in the end, progress marches on.
Before you know it, that progressive idea that "will ruin the world" is accepted by a majority, and soon taken for granted.
In Australia alone over the last hundred years:
• Women and aboriginals got the vote
• Aboriginal land rights
• White Australia policy gone
• Decent welfare system
• Annual leave
• Sick leave
• Maternity leave > Paternity leave > Paid parental leave
• Socialised healthcare (Medibank then Medicare)
• Offering ethics classes in lieu of scripture in NSW schools
...and many more...
All of the above were opposed -often staunchly- by the conservatives of the day.
Another 20 years and we'll be a republic. The ongoing rise in Atheism and decline of Christianity will mean that in another 10 years Christianity will fall below 50% in Australia. Gay marriage will probably be recognised here within 5 years.
Humanity moves on, and future generations will wonder what all the fuss was about.
I'm not saying that people will change their existing position en-masse. I don't believe that is the method of progression. It's just that future generations always hold a more progressive position than their forebears. One day the "progressive" position is the one held by the majority, and change occurs. No doubt when I'm 80, I will hold a conservative position on many issues compared to my children, but it is their position that will eventually win out.
The position on issues held by most "conservatives" today have progressed from the position held by the "conservatives" of 30 years ago. Can you imagine a "conservative" politician of 10 years ago arguing in support of gay marriage? Can you imagine socialised healthcare having bipartisan support 50 years ago? Yet, here we are.
So, apart from causing a stir, what's the point of my post? Well, I'm curious what people think of the "inevitability" of change. Do you believe that change is not inevitable? Are you resigned to change, but annoyed by it? Or do you happily accept that new generations hold more progressive positions?
Tags: conservatism, progress
Permalink Reply by Dr Caroline Wright on August 2, 2012 at 11:26pm A very interesting post Phillip which may raise a few hairs and some lively discussion.
We need to take care of our children and be involved with their schooling and be informed about what is being taught in these their very informative years. And also be alert to values that may be contrary to those held by ourselves, the parents, and debate such issues through appropriate school forums.
Now about change. Yes I believe that as we grow in knowledge and wisdom change is bound to occur. But I do not believe in change for change sake.
Acceptance of change can be difficult for some people. Normality is like that old warm comfortable jumper that you like to put on and snuggle up with a good book and you get that feeling that all is right with the world and you feel at peace. When change occurs and a new jumper is bought it looks nicer and cleaner and probably fits a bit better and you are convinced that the new is better than the old. But sometime you will get that old jumper out and wear it just for a little while because of the memories surrounding that old jumper which still have to be attached to the new jumper.
Kind regards
Caroline
Permalink Reply by Phillip Watson on August 3, 2012 at 10:08am Dale,
I'm not attempting to point out shortcomings in others. I'm merely saying that today's "dangerous progressive change" is tomorrow's normality. The views held by the left today will often be the views of the right in a few decades, while the views of the left will have progressed even further. And so the cycle continues. As I wrote above, I have no doubt that by the time I'm 80 my views will be far more conservative than those of my children. In fact, although I don't consider myself a conservative now, I'm sure that I'm more conservative than most young adults today.
Note that when I say "progressed" I'm not necessarily saying that means progress for the better, I'm simply saying that it happens, and always has. For example 500 years ago you'd be executed for adultery, and divorce was unheard of. Today, even the most conservative amongst us wouldn't advocate execution, and divorce is commonplace (many would argue too common).
As for Christianity...It has been slowly dying in most developed nations for a long time. I don't think anyone is predicting it will suddenly disappear, just that there is a long and constant decline. It's inevitable that Christianity will soon fall below 50%.
Permalink Reply by Jan Courtney on August 3, 2012 at 11:06am Oh poor Phillip, you have such a pessimistic view of the world.
Permalink Reply by Phillip Watson on August 3, 2012 at 3:04pm Jan Courtney said:
Oh poor Phillip, you have such a pessimistic view of the world.
Pessimistic???
Permalink Reply by Jan Courtney on August 3, 2012 at 4:15pm Yep Absolutely
Phillip Watson said:
Jan Courtney said:
Oh poor Phillip, you have such a pessimistic view of the world.
Pessimistic???
Permalink Reply by Dr Caroline Wright on August 3, 2012 at 6:15pm Phillip you said that One day the "progressive" position is the one held by the majority, and change occurs. I go back to where the Greens Party fits here which I raised in Beverley's new topic "Capitalism or Socialism????" They are implementing great changes but certainly are not in the majority. What are your thoughts about this?
Permalink Reply by Stephen Cox on August 4, 2012 at 12:26am The only constant is change,But Progress is undertaken by all members of Humanity as we grow through lifes experiences.
However do not confuse political idealogies such as the so called "Progressive Movement" born in America just over one hundred years ago as being what it purports itself to be.
Unpopular Political Idealogies are just that for a reason,Why is it for instance that despite years of flim flannery the Greens only control some 10% on average of the Voting public,For every person who has no idea or doesn't care that may Vote Green the Majority reject their Ideals from a perspective of balanced self serving and Social Reality.
For instance a Mother cannot be a good mother unless she at times responds to her own needs that some may construe as selfish,For to look after ones Children one must first look after oneself or risk being incapable of doing so.
A good real life example would be a drug Addict.Someone that by definition does not care for themselves and as experience shows us in Society proves incapable of looking after Children bnecause of that addiction.
Now when you consider the "progressive View" such as Decriminalise drugs then any fool can see what the Disaster is that would be looming after that change in the Law for the experience has already be so publically lived by members of Society ,Therefore Society in the Main rejects such moves and would by your definition be considered "Conservative".
The truth of the matter is they are Wise and Wisdom is often attacked by those on the Left as being Conservative,Therefore by Rote being Progressive would probably equate to being Foolish.
When you look at some of the Progressives such as Bob Brown ( They have extincted themselves etc speech) the He fits the Role of Progressive Fool.
Not all progress is made by Fools though,In fact many worthy ideas have progressed the general condition of mankind and the impetus has come from people some would consider Conservative far more often than from the Left side of Politics.
Permalink Reply by Dr Caroline Wright on August 4, 2012 at 2:53pm I agree with several of the above responses as it is not either/or it is on a continuum:
conservatism <--------------------------------------->progress-oriented
and people can sit somewhere on the line at different times in their lives and sometimes on different issues.
Permalink Reply by Jan Courtney on August 4, 2012 at 4:00pm It's very interesting that church attendances are dropping in the mainstream churches, but many of the others (what some may refer to as happy clappers - no offence meant) are thriving. Young people are going in droves, I see them pouring into "Lifehouse" on Sundays. I have also noticed though, that in my own (Catholic) parish, baptisms are increasing , and where a couple of years ago we didn't seem to hear babies and toddlers in church, we now do.
Are the statistics incorrect, or are people finding an increasing need to be in touch with their God ?
Permalink Reply by Stephen Cox on August 4, 2012 at 7:19pm I think one of the best advocates with a vision for the future was Gene Rodenberry the Creator of Star Trek,When you look back at the Original series and consider the timeframe it was made in it was certainly progressive thinking ideas wise,But the future Vision was clearly and openly laid out for all to see and aspire towards.
Current progressives such as proponents of Agenda 21 operate in secrecy,Witness we have yet to be told just exactly what Combet signed Australia up for on a number of Occasions now,That alone in my books is a dead giveaway that he would probably be lynched in any town in Australia if people actually knew what he had done,If that is Progress bring back the Local Sherriff and Boot Hill at least back then justice was Swift and upkeep at a minimal cost to the Law Abiding Citizen.
When taken into context with so much of what is occurring with Judgements from the Legal Proffession then we have likely in many cases gone backwards not forwards for there are certainly some crimes where the punishment needs reappraising for the type and severity of offence.
Permalink Reply by Phillip Watson on August 6, 2012 at 6:52pm Dr Caroline Wright said:
Phillip you said that One day the "progressive" position is the one held by the majority, and change occurs. I go back to where the Greens Party fits here which I raised in Beverley's new topic "Capitalism or Socialism????" They are implementing great changes but certainly are not in the majority. What are your thoughts about this?
I don't think either pure capitalism or pure socialism works practically. Looking around the World, we can see that economies and people within countries that have moved too far one way or the other have suffered. I think Australia has a nice blend of capitalism and socialism.
I'm not a huge fan of the greens, however like all parties I think they have some policies/positions of merit. Carbon tax aside, are they implementing "great changes" that are not supported by the majority? Can you give me some examples?
Permalink Reply by Phillip Watson on August 6, 2012 at 7:18pm Jan Courtney said:
It's very interesting that church attendances are dropping in the mainstream churches, but many of the others (what some may refer to as happy clappers - no offence meant) are thriving. Young people are going in droves, I see them pouring into "Lifehouse" on Sundays. I have also noticed though, that in my own (Catholic) parish, baptisms are increasing , and where a couple of years ago we didn't seem to hear babies and toddlers in church, we now do.
Are the statistics incorrect, or are people finding an increasing need to be in touch with their God ?
Looking at the Census stats, the Pentecostal churches (eg Hillsong) are the only Christian denomination that are holding ground as a % of population. All of the others are declining.
While they do get huge numbers attending their "services", in my experience they are short-lived parishioners. They hang around for a few months, then fade away. There is a huge turnover.
Honest Government, Fair Rights to property and compensation, Australia and our people strong and proud, reinstatement of values and respect
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Politics. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 2 minutes ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 6 minutes ago.
Started by greg rauchle in Activism. Last reply by Geoff Hutchesson 51 minutes ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Activism. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 1 hour ago.
Started by Geoff Hutchesson in Entertainment, Books, Movies, Music. Last reply by Barbara lee 1 hour ago.
Started by Barbara lee in Entertainment, Books, Movies, Music. Last reply by Barbara lee 1 hour ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Activism. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 2 hours ago.
Started by james darby in Politics. Last reply by Russell Scott 7 hours ago.
Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Ian Davies 11 hours ago.
Started by Bob Stewart in Activism. Last reply by Bob Stewart 13 hours ago.
Started by Alyn Roule in Politics. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 23 hours ago.
Started by Norm Finkelstein in General. Last reply by Norm Finkelstein yesterday.
Started by Rob Moore in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.
Started by Alyn Roule in General. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.
Started by Alyn Roule in Agriculture. Last reply by Alyn Roule yesterday.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Politics. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright yesterday.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright yesterday.
Started by Stephen Cox in Activism. Last reply by Stephen Cox yesterday.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Education. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright on Sunday.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in Activism. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright on Sunday.
Posted by kate wade on April 12, 2013 at 9:12pm — 4 Comments
Posted by alex and sonja kraskov on March 25, 2013 at 4:30pm — 50 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on March 2, 2013 at 4:36am — 1 Comment
Posted by Terry S. Singeltary Sr. on February 14, 2013 at 4:10am — 5 Comments
Posted by Geoff Hutchesson on February 8, 2013 at 9:11am — 6 Comments
© 2013 Created by Rob Moore.
Powered by