Real People - facing the forgotten issues with friendship and a little fun.
Yesterday I watched a convoy of tugs towing barges loaded with dredging spoil past Tannum Sands to the dumping grounds in open waters just outside the entrance to Gladstone Harbour, the scene of widespread controversy surrounding continuing catches of sick fish and dead marine animals.
On Wild Cattle Island, a national park just south of Tannum beach, I saw the carcass of another dead adult turtle washed up at low tide, the latest in more than 200 strandings.
In the past week, local media outlets have all run full-page advertisements from the Gladstone Ports Corporation stating "Water quality in Gladstone Harbour is OK". Tell that to the fish.
Meanwhile, for almost five years I have been writing a weekly column, 'What Goes Around' in The Gladstone Observer. For the past month, I have focussed on the harbour controversy but it has now been axed because of "budget restrictions". All online comments to articles relating to the harbour and diseased fish were removed just over a week ago and since then new articles have not allowed online comment.
All that could be coincidental and I am not suggesting otherwise, just presenting the circumstances. My last article, published in today's Observer (October 17) appears below:
SO The Federal Labor Government has finally had its controversial carbon tax adopted by the House of Representatives as part of its stated aim to save our environment and the world for our grandchildren.
Living in Gladstone, the industrial hub currently the focus of more than $60 billion in planned new resource projects, I find their claimed environmental concerns difficult to swallow.
How can they declare war on “carbon” when just one of these developments is planned to eventually double coal exports here alone by an extra 80 million tonnes a year, which will go to countries with no carbon tax and lower emission controls?
How can they save the environment for our grandchildren when we have large numbers of marine creatures dying and the seafood industry has been crippled by continuing catches of diseased fish?
We all know the official word is that water quality in the harbour is fine despite the massive dredging program, the sick fish are getting better and serious skin conditions presented by more than 30 fishermen and others could not be linked to infected fish or contaminated water.
The State Government has appointed an independent panel of experts to investigate the situation, but the crucial point is that they will be reviewing existing data provided by DERM and Gladstone Ports Corporation. They will not be conducting any new independent tests, so repeated calls by fishermen, local politicians and others have not been addressed.
Almost nightly since the fishing ban was lifted just over a week ago, we have seen TV footage of rejected fish catches including a 660kg haul which was 100 percent infected. Sharks also had a red skin rash.
The pro fishers are forced to bear the cost of disposal on top of wasted time and fuel. Manager of the Gladstone Fish Market Simon Whittingham is now refusing to accept any catches from the previous 500 sq km closure area, as well as Port Alma.
It’s a drastic situation made worse by the spectacle of Fisheries Minister Craig Wallace telling State Parliament about the closure and re-opening, “Don’t blame me, it was all done at departmental level”.
Yes, Minister?
To those who have followed my views and adventures for almost five years, you might not be surprised to hear this is my last column. I’m proud to have helped focus national media attention on these issues, so rest assured I’ll still be throwing a punch or two elsewhere.
‘What goes around, comes around’.
(See also Member for Burnett, Rob Messenger's Just Grounds blog here
and my article at The Punch see here
UPDATE #1 28th Oct new article at Unleashed, Gladstone fish can't read - Read More
Permalink Reply by Dale Stiller on October 17, 2011 at 10:21am
Permalink Reply by Dale Stiller on October 17, 2011 at 10:31am From your article above - "so rest assured I’ll still be throwing a punch or two elsewhere."
The paper of course would not allowed you to say that you will now be publishing reasonbly reguarly at The Punch blog site and that they can come across & read your articles there.
Permalink Reply by alan mikkelsen on October 17, 2011 at 6:52pm Bro' john, I am very proud of you. This has been a brave fight and it is very much an on-going one. I realise that many here are pre-occupied with other also very important matters at the moment - Property Rights / TOH, CSG, live cattle exports, other land lock-up issues and more, but I really hope that many members take the time to read this new post of yours, and get behind the campaign which is also being valiantly pushed by Dale and Rob Messenger. Shortly, I'll be off to The Punch again.
Cheers and good luck. bro' al
Permalink Reply by Dale Stiller on October 17, 2011 at 7:07pm Found a web site set up by a law firm with the aim to represent the commercial fishers in the Gladstone area. This first link is to the home page and to a quick method of learning what this law firm is hoping to achieve is best gained by viewing the youtbe at the bottom of the page. [click here]
There are a fair few maps on this site, when you follow the link above, just click on the MAP tab at the top of the page.
The map that I have copied below is off the home page & gives you an idea of the number of big projects under way in Gladstone at the same time. The ones connected to coal seam gas are the four LNG projects on Curtis Island found towards the top right hand of the map.
Proposed Projects - Port of Gladstone |
|||||
|
Mikko, sensational article. You're flying on the side of the angels.
The fishermen and farmers point out that if you cut down half a mangrove or clear one gum in a coloured zone, you'll have the QLD Government tree police knocking on your door armed with fines worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and jail sentences...
But if you destroy an ecosystem on the edge of the Great Barrier Reef ... and you've got $42 B dollars + and QLD owes the rest of the world $85 B...
.. Its far easier to politically flogg a few QLD fishers and farmers ... in order to build up the green "bob brownie" points than dealing with the reality of full blown environmental disaster at the southern gate way of one of the world's natural wonders.
Sounds as if the Gladstone local paper has the same courage and commitment to reporting the facts as its sister in Bundaberg
Rob
Permalink Reply by Laurel V on October 17, 2011 at 9:59pm as Rob said, sure appears the papers are being told..
and you mentioned sane Qs re carbon
how dare you:-)
you know thats Not allowed.
and yeah if not dredged heavy metals off boat hulls?
tin poisoning or that other nasty they use to keep limpets off? methyl? whatever?
wonder whats being sumped from the gas sites into the water late at night?
just a thought.
where were samples taken..
and why? no ongoing testing
fishy..smells higher than the dead real ones.
Thanks for the support you lot, but Rob I think I might have jumped in where angels fear to tread up here :-) Laurel, there are other possible contributing factors such as the ones you mentioned and others but dredging in known acid sulphate soils areas as well as silt in previously undredged locations has to be high on the list of suspects. Gladstone has for many years been home to aluminium refineries, a smelter, chemical plants and a major power station so who knows what residues may now be stirred up?
There is "on going testing" by the GPC and DERM but questions have been raised over the depth and location of sample sites and how missing data at some sites has been recorded. Read the article and comments at The Punch if you want more details. People are still sending me other material relating to acid soils which I will post after having a chance to study it.
Here is a link to a report by a major GPC consultancy, Environmetrics, which an independent scientist sent me. Some interesting comments about missing data on page one.
Rob, worth getting hold of the DERM report on acid sulphate soils referred to below if you can. I posted this at The Punch:
if a sufficient number of concerned residents joined the calls by fishermen and politicians for independent tests, the authorities could find it difficult to refuse but the fact is many are afraid to speak out. The regional council has accepted the official version that all is well.
Meanwhile I've been sent a PDF version 3.8 of the "Queensland acid sulphate soil technical manual - Soil management guidelines" which contains highly relevant and concerning material on pages 56 - 60, seeing the presence of acid sulphate in some dredged material has been admitted. It states "Risks associated withoffshore disposal of ASS include: • smothering of marine organisms with sulfidic sediments; • acidification of the marine environment; and • contamination of the marine environment with heavy metals or other toxicants."
Just Grounds Community is a social network
Started by Geoff Brown in Climate Change. Last reply by Stephen Cox 3 hours ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Stephen Cox 3 hours ago.
Started by Geoff Brown in General. Last reply by Stephen Cox 3 hours ago.
Started by Jan Courtney in General. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright 4 hours ago.
Started by Robert William Nickisson in Politics. Last reply by Robert William Nickisson 5 hours ago.
Started by Sarah Lamonte in Health. Last reply by Sarah Lamonte 5 hours ago.
Started by John Mikkelsen in Environment. Last reply by Jeff Hutcho 6 hours ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Stephen Cox 6 hours ago.
Started by Rory Donnellan in General. Last reply by Barbara lee 8 hours ago.
Started by Ian Macrae Yeates in General. Last reply by Jan Courtney 11 hours ago.
Started by Barbara lee in General. Last reply by Barbara lee 12 hours ago.
Started by Joanne Rea in Agriculture. Last reply by Dale Stiller 13 hours ago.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Barbara lee 13 hours ago.
Started by Cate Stuart in General. Last reply by Jeff Hutcho 14 hours ago.
Started by Ian Macrae Yeates in General. Last reply by Ian Macrae Yeates 15 hours ago.
Started by Dale Stiller in Politics. Last reply by Barbara lee 19 hours ago.
Started by John C Fairfax in General. Last reply by Jeff Hutcho yesterday.
Started by vivienne skeen in Politics. Last reply by Stephen Cox yesterday.
Started by John Michelmore in Agriculture. Last reply by Rob Moore yesterday.
Started by Dr Caroline Wright in General. Last reply by Dr Caroline Wright yesterday.
Posted by Peter Malcolm Crawford on April 28, 2012 at 11:17am — 1 Comment
Posted by Terry S. Singeltary Sr. on April 25, 2012 at 8:05am — 4 Comments
Posted by Ian Macrae Yeates on April 22, 2012 at 7:36pm — 5 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on April 21, 2012 at 3:01am — 5 Comments
Posted by Colin Uebergang on April 20, 2012 at 5:17pm — 18 Comments
© 2012 Created by Rob Moore.
Powered by
.